Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
121. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: nah i'll reiterate it since you are slow interceptor warp speed > maulus warp speed defender cap speed > attacker cap speed disengage and move to next cap point feel free to stop any t...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:22:14
|
122. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Veskrashen wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: Eli Apol wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: the fact that you are resorting to such a restricted, unrealistic vignette is betraying your desperation Like reducing a mechanic down to just one ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:21:10
|
123. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: Eli Apol wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: the fact that you are resorting to such a restricted, unrealistic vignette is betraying your desperation Like reducing a mechanic down to just one (a...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:19:54
|
124. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
PotatoOverdose wrote: Yroc Jannseen wrote: You keep throwing this 40 minute number around. How many systems do you really think are going to have industry 5? Do you think this is enough motivation to get people out and mine the ludicrous am...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:19:05
|
125. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: the fact that you are resorting to such a restricted, unrealistic vignette is betraying your desperation Like reducing a mechanic down to just one (attempted) troll use of it? there's no desperat...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:17:17
|
126. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
EvilweaselFinance wrote: PotatoOverdose wrote: Idk what any alliance is planning, but the fact that their interceptors scarred you lot for life is hilarious. i suppose i need to add post type 4: "im tired of getting beaten like a re...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:16:11
|
127. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
PotatoOverdose wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: Acuma wrote: Your objective is to spend 20-30 minutes in an active system to waste about 2-4 minutes of the defender and nothing else? Have fun with that.....I will enjoy the countless man h...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:15:21
|
128. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
also fyi the timer can only be 40 minutes if the system has an industrial index of 5 there are no regions in the game with an average industrial index above one except providence
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:11:29
|
129. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Acuma wrote: Your objective is to spend 20-30 minutes in an active system to waste about 2-4 minutes of the defender and nothing else? Have fun with that.....I will enjoy the countless man hours wasted by these supposed "burn down all of nullse...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:10:35
|
130. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
also wow i didn't even notice the last eft warrior post's terrible dps i just assumed that the ship had alpha-strike capability my expectations for competence here somehow managed to sink even lower lmbo 55.5 seconds to sink an interceptor
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:07:42
|
131. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
PotatoOverdose wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: M1k3y Koontz wrote: https://i.imgur.com/dZoUBJK.jpg 45 DPS at 124km, your interceptor is dead in under a minute (55.5 seconds, yes I did the math) It's also a fifth the cost. Your ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:06:10
|
132. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Aiyshimin wrote: Its not their own space they worry about, its their rented space. Currently hundreds of renters dock up when 5-man gang in T1 ships shows up 3 systems away, and stay docked until the gang leaves. ting. In sov 2.0, pvp is the ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:05:10
|
133. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: the fact that I am among the top posters in this thread means that I have far from ignored it the fact that you are ignoring my sublime truth does not translate into it being wrong Your sublime tr...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:01:33
|
134. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
M1k3y Koontz wrote: https://i.imgur.com/dZoUBJK.jpg 45 DPS at 124km, your interceptor is dead in under a minute (55.5 seconds, yes I did the math) It's also a fifth the cost. Your move. please do not post fits that only kill the int...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:00:43
|
135. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: if moa was so organized then why did they fail to participate even in a token fashion in cfc pvp objectives during their short stay in the cfc anoms are a hell of a drug Yay let's ignore the argum...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 20:55:49
|
136. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
if moa was so organized then why did they fail to participate even in a token fashion in cfc pvp objectives during their short stay in the cfc anoms are a hell of a drug
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 20:51:43
|
137. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
MASSADEATH wrote: Sougiro Seta wrote: What MASSADEATH pretends is somehow like Cuba invading USA. You blame a group of people for being more organized, more rich and, basically, more people than your group. you are not more organized lol
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 20:50:20
|
138. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: interceptor disengages and goes to new objective it cannot be killed Didn't want those 42 minutes anyways? at least you are admitting that the interceptor cannot be killed
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 20:42:51
|
139. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
interceptor disengages and goes to new objective it cannot be killed
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 20:39:57
|
140. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
PotatoOverdose wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: PotatoOverdose wrote: Sure, but I don't agree that interceptors lead to a bore off.] yes but your stubborn refusal to admit reality is not an argument, it's just you sticking your fingers ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 20:37:56
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |